Diana Hendel, Pharm.D., and Mark Goulston, M.D., are the authors of “Trauma to Triumph: A Roadmap for Leading Through Disruption and Thriving on the Other Side” and “Why Cope When You Can Heal?: How Healthcare Heroes of COVID-19 Can Recover from PTSD.” Hendel is an executive coach and leadership consultant, and former hospital CEO. Goulston is a board-certified psychiatrist, former assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at UCLA-NPI, and a former FBI and police hostage negotiation trainer.
Eventually, a major crisis will impact your company. It’s not a matter of “if” but of “when.” And while COVID-19 is the most obvious disruptor, it’s certainly not the last. We all face a new era of uncertainty, volatility and disruption. Organizations are rocked by technological shake-ups, shifting consumer habits and political and social unrest, not to mention internal upheavals like harassment, violence, scandal and more.
The most resilient organizations are those that prepare to deal with traumatic events. Organizations that will stand the test of time are those that put a plan in place to deal with the kinds of disasters that could create traumatic stress in their people and destabilize their culture.
What does such a plan look like? While it varies and is too comprehensive to describe here, there are a few “must haves” of resilient organizations.
Get a firm grasp on the difference between trauma and stress. While stress upsets our balance in the moment, we still maintain a feeling of control over our lives. Most of us deal with routine stress daily and are able to manage it. Trauma, on the other hand, overwhelms our self-protective structure and sends us scrambling for survival. It leaves us vulnerable, helpless, groundless. It shatters our sense of safety and security and changes how we look at the world. Unaddressed, it can result in long-term harm.
Launch a Rapid Response Process the moment a crisis occurs. You might think of this as a “Code Blue.” It’s a standardized, preplanned approach for dealing with disruption. Getting one in place helps everyone know exactly what to do so decisions can be made quickly, efficiently, and with a focus on safety. Here are the components to focus on:
“Name, claim, and frame trauma” from the onset. This helps everyone understand what is happening to individuals and to the group. It gives us the language to talk about it so that everyone is on the same page. It helps people say, “Aha, this is why I am feeling so bad!” And it gives everyone permission to finally seek real help.
Know the “red flags” of traumatized employees. When people are traumatized, they experience the “fight, flight, freeze” survival response. This is the body’s natural response to danger that enables us to defend ourselves or flee to safety, or freeze, as a means of survival. Fight, flight, freeze can manifest in different ways. Some people might become hostile, belligerent, aggressive, or otherwise “difficult” — often seemingly without adequate cause. Others might cling to their “competence zone,” blindly doing what they’ve always done even though it no longer works. People dig in and resist change. Or they may insist they are “fine,” even when it is clear they are struggling.
Meanwhile, leaders may behave in distinctively un-leaderly ways as well. They might hide out in their office instead of jumping into action, or else make rash, knee-jerk decisions when they were previously known for levelheaded steadiness.
Get super focused on communication. (Think: “VITAL.”) In times of crisis, employees need frequent, real-time, transparent communication more than ever. The acronym VITAL will help you remember the tenets around communicating in the aftermath of trauma:
Use “both/and” to stop post-trauma polarization. When a traumatic event occurs, opposing views can divide the organization. People believe the right course of action is either “A” or “B.” They see themselves as right and the other side as wrong. Leaders succumb to pressure and choose one option over the other — say, Choice A. When the downsides of that action appear, they reverse courses and go to the other extreme. Naturally, the downsides of Choice B then appear … and leaders swing back to Choice A. With every swing of the pendulum, division deepens. This is incredibly damaging to your culture.
A “BOTH/AND” mindset helps us manage polarization. Instead of approaching issues with an either/or mentality, organizations can leverage both sides of these polarities with a both/and approach. The idea is to maximize the effects of both sides and minimize the downsides of each. For example, in a crisis, effective leaders can BOTH take charge AND build consensus. They can be direct and candid AND diplomatic and tactful.
It actually is possible to recover and go on to thrive in the aftermath of trauma. But it’s a process — and the process starts long before the disruptive event occurs.
Don’t be caught unprepared. When trauma shows up at your front door, the sooner you take action, the sooner you can make things right — and the sooner your employees can be on the road to healing. | AC&F |